Election 2025

Your voice matters. Use these questions to hold leaders accountable for the future of public healthcare in Newfoundland and Labrador.

A Note from President Yvette Coffey, RN

 

Nurses across Newfoundland and Labrador are asking tough but fair questions in this election — not just for themselves, but for every patient, family, and community that relies on our public healthcare system.

These questions have also been formally posed to the leaders of all political parties. As their responses come in, we will post them here so our members and the public can see where each leader stands.

Choose one or two questions that matter most to you. Ask them when you meet a candidate at the door, at a community event, or online. Then share their answers with your friends and family.

Together, we can push for real action to build a safer, stronger public healthcare system.

See What the Leaders Said – Full Responses Below

 

Liberal Party

New Democratic Party

Progressive Conservative Party

Election 2025: Party Leaders Talk Health Care and Nursing with Yvette Coffey

Questions You can Ask Candidates

Party responses have been presented in alphabetical order by party name. The order in which the responses are listed in no way indicates an endorsement or preference for any political party, leader, or candidate. Content has been provided for informational purposes only. We encourage everyone to engage with the candidates during the election campaign.

Nurse Practitioner (NP) Funding

Context: Nurse Practitioners (NPs) can diagnose, prescribe, and run clinics especially in communities where access to public healthcare is limited. But without stable funding, many communities can’t rely on them.

Ask this: “Will you commit to permanent funding for Nurse Practitioners so they can keep clinics open and provide care where it’s needed most?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes. Though we would consult with nurse practitioners and their union in the design of the system, we envision one that allows them to bill MCP for their services, much like the one currently in place for physicians. It would allow nurse practitioners to use a blended capitation model for compensation. The NL NDP would work to implement policy changes to support nurse practitioners recruitment, retention and integration into the public healthcare system, including sustainable funding within the first two years of forming government.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. First and foremost, our plan will be implemented in lockstep with the Registered Nurses’ Union and the Nurse Practitioners Association. The funding model will be designed with your input, not designed based on presumptions or imposed from the top down, and it will enable Nurse Practitioners to practice to their full scope in both primary and collaborative care settings, because this ensures patients everywhere can benefit from the full value of your training and abilities.

Under a PC government, no one in Newfoundland and Labrador will have to pay to see a Nurse Practitioner. No strings attached.

We will set up a billing system that will allow Nurse Practitioners to bill the government directly for their services. All Nurse Practitioners will be able to participate. We will act quickly to implement this billing system. The timeline will be determined by our consultations with you on the design of the funding model, but the era of the government dragging its heels will end. In short order, you will see changes that are urgently needed and will greatly benefit everyone.

Never forget that, year after year, the governing Liberals absolutely refused our calls to cover Nurse Practitioner clinic visits, despite the terrible impact on patients needing care. It is important for nurses to be heeded after elections, not just on their eve.

Nurse Practitioners play a vital role – indeed, an indispensable role – in our healthcare system. We firmly believe that making full use of the skills of Nurse Practitioners will strengthen our healthcare teams and better serve people needing care, leading to better outcomes.

Recognizing that some 163,000 Newfoundlanders and Labradorians do not have access to a family doctor, giving Nurse Practitioners the ability to bill the government directly for their service will allow people to access care when they need it, without paying out of pocket.

Province-Wide Travel Nurse Program

Context: Many rural and remote communities can’t access consistent public healthcare. The Registered Nurses’ Union proposed a public travel nurse program that has already worked well in Labrador. Unlike private agency contracts, this program keeps care in the public system and ensures communities get the help they need.

Ask this: “Will you commit to a permanent public travel nurse program, building on the success in Labrador, so every rural, remote, and underserved community has access to care when local staff aren’t available?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes. We were disappointed that the provincial government had not taken any action to expand on the successes of the pilot program in Labrador, especially when over 80 per cent of nurses are willing to participate. We see it as a feasible, flexible model for providing primary care in rural and remote regions. The NDP would roll out the program gradually, region by region, starting with the areas in greatest need. Our goal is to complete the expansion over a four-year mandate and pay nurses and nurse practitioners the same premium that is currently offered in Labrador.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. The ongoing reliance on out-of-province travel nurses is disrespectful to local healthcare workers. It is shocking that the Liberals and NLHS let the travel nurse scandal occur. We heard from local Newfoundland and Labrador nurses who have left their jobs due to the travel nurse scandal. Nurses tell us that they feel disrespected and ignored – and of course they feel this way when they have been subject to mandatory overtime and working next to someone who costs four times as much as their salary. Had the Liberals listened to nurses instead of ignoring and lecturing you, the vacancies that these agencies filled would never have occurred to begin with. This was a crisis of the Liberal government’s making, as nurses remember better than anyone. We will create a permanent province-wide team of local, Newfoundland and Labrador nurses and Nurse Practitioners. This team will complete locums in different parts of the province, when and where they’re needed most – especially in rural, remote, and underserviced communities. This will reduce the reliance on expensive out-of-province travel nurses. We are determined to implement this quickly. We will do so in lockstep with the Registered Nurses’ Union and will listen to your advice on the size and composition of the team, and where and when locums should start.

Core Staffing Review

Context: Nurses have been promised a review of how many staff are truly needed to keep patients safe. But reviews mean little if they aren’t finished quickly and acted on.

Ask this: “Will you finish the staffing review within six months and act on the results so hospitals and clinics have enough nurses?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Absolutely. We look forward to seeing the results of the core staffing review and using them to inform a staffing strategy that uses our nursing workforce in the most efficient way possible. We commit to using this information right away in a collaborative manner by working with the RNU and nurses on the front lines, to develop a plan that works for nurses and improves patient care.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. Tolerating the burnout and exhaustion of Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners is unacceptable. Your workloads and schedules must be reasonable so you can perform your duties as health care professionals to the best of your ability. Having a safe, accessible, and quality health care system starts with supporting our health care workers.

The first step in this process is to identify the root causes and challenges facing Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners. The Registered Nurses’ Union must play a key part in helping a PC Government identify these issues.

Informed by those discussions, we will work together to put together a realistic and achievable plan to address the issues of burnout and exhaustion. We will work together to minimize the amount of overtime Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners need to endure.

To help support our nursing staff, a PC Government will conduct a core staffing review. Successive Liberal government have wasted too much time already not getting this done. It is time for real change, and a review is the first step toward meaningful change, so I will commit to having this review completed within six months. Again, this will be a collaborative process, involving consultations with Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners. Once this review has been completed, we will give the results to the Registered Nurses’ Union. We will work with you to implement the results. This is your profession. You know it best, and you ought to be given leadership roles in ensuring your profession’s staffing levels are modernized, safe, and data-informed across the province.

Safe Hours of Work

Context: Other safety-sensitive jobs, like pilots and truck drivers, have laws that prevent them from working dangerously long hours. Nurses don’t even though they are responsible for people’s health and safety.

Ask this: “Will you pass a law to set safe limits on how many hours nurses can be forced to work?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes. The NDP will commit to working with the RNU and other stakeholders to draft effective safe hours legislation that boosts worker satisfaction and improves patient care. This includes establishing limits on consecutive work hours and stopping mandatory overtime.This is a safety issue, not just for nurses, but also for patients. We support your position that prolonged shifts increase the risk of medical errors and harm to your members and all health care workers in similar situations. We believe that such legislation would be increasingly feasible as we enact our NDP Cares plan to tackle the vacancies in our public healthcare system (see below for more details). That’s why we would aim to pass legislation in the middle of a four-year term and make it operational within one year after that.

Our proposed legislation and regulations would limit the number of consecutive work hours to 12 per shift, a maximum of four successive shifts, and a minimum of 11 hours of rest between shifts, as recommended by the Canadian Federation of Nurses’ Unions. We would also explore requirements that include mandatory use of comprehensive fatigue management programs.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. It is outrageous and unacceptable that nurses are forced to work to their breaking point. This puts patients at risk and also contributes to nurses leaving their positions. We envision a healthcare system where nurses are respected, where students want to become nurses, and where nurses from all over Canada look to Newfoundland and Labrador as a place they want to work. That starts with respecting nurses and listening to you.

As we know from professionals in aviation and transportation, pushing people in life-critical positions until they are too exhausted to focus or perform their skills properly is a recipe for disaster. This is a life safety issue and must be addressed with urgency, with you as nurses taking a lead role in finding solutions that will work.

What we will commit to is first sitting down with the Registered Nurses’ Union to explore more about how we can improve working conditions and hours. We will also undertake a jurisdictional review to see what best practices exist and how we can implement them here.

We want to work with nurses and the Union to improve safety, work-life balance, and working conditions for nurses.

Ending Mandatory Overtime

Context: Nurses are often forced to work back-to-back shifts because of short staffing. This isn’t safe for patients or sustainable for nurses. The system needs better planning and hiring.

Ask this: “Will you stop using mandatory overtime as a way to staff hospitals, and hire enough nurses so public healthcare is safe?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

We believe that mandatory overtime reduces the morale of nurses, leading to burnout and the exodus from the public system that we’ve seen over the last few years. It also jeopardizes nurses and patient care and safety. That’s why New Democrats will work with the RNU and others to end mandated overtime.

The NDP Cares plan for healthcare (please consult our platform document) is designed to boost recruitment and strengthen retention by improving working conditions, creating financial incentives, intensifying recruitment in our health professional schools, and bringing front-line workers into the decision-making process that affect how they do their work. As more people enter and re-enter the public workforce, the need for mandatory overtime will inevitably decrease. We would also use the nursing core staffing review, as well as the health human resource plan, to guide strategic hiring practices going forward.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. As noted in the previous answer, we want to work with nurses and the Union to help nurses achieve a healthy work-life balance and avoid exhaustion, and for that reason, we are committed to understanding how we can improve working conditions and hours, and getting

meaningful change happening. Working collaboratively with you, we will develop a working plan, a timely implementation schedule and a meaningful process to evaluate and improve how it is working.

In addition, we will create and follow a Health Human Resource Plan. This will publicly outline the mix of healthcare providers who are needed, where they are needed, and when they are needed. Healthcare workers themselves will be fully involved in creating this plan. The era of top-down, half-hearted decision-making will end. We know that the current government has released a plan, but it is incomplete and based on outdated data. It is imperative that we work together immediately to replace the failed plan the Liberals cobbled together. Our plan will set clear targets for the numbers of healthcare professionals who should be on staff, where and in which departments, and when. We want all Unions to be hands-on in creating this. The plan will have measurable targets and reliable numbers, so health care professionals and patients can hold us accountable.

Nurse-Patient Ratios

Context: Research shows patients do better and nurses stay in the profession when there are safe limits on how many patients each nurse cares for. Right now, those limits don’t exist in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Ask this: “Will you set safe nurse-to-patient ratios so patients get the care they need and nurses aren’t stretched too thin?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes, as part of a robust safe staffing framework as outlined by your union, this issue speaks to nurse retention, a more positive and safe work environment and improved patient care. Those are issues the NL NDP wholeheartedly supports. The NL NDP would consider only those ratios or ratio-setting frameworks backed up by research, supported by the RNU NL, and proven to result in nurse and patient safety. We would work collaboratively with appropriate stakeholders to enshrine the chosen ratios or frameworks in legislation, and find the resources to make sure that these ratios are then achieved by the end of a four-year term.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. As noted in the previous answer, we will follow a robust and transparent Health Human Resource Plan. A part of this plan will focus on the issue of nurse-patient ratios. We want the Union, and nurses themselves, to help lead the process of setting these ratios, because we know that it is the frontline healthcare workers who truly know best how to fix our healthcare system.

Full-Time Jobs for Nursing Graduates

Context: Newfoundland and Labrador needs more nurses, but many new grads can’t get permanent jobs here. We risk losing them to other provinces if they can’t build a future at home.

Ask this: “Will you guarantee full-time permanent jobs for new nursing graduates so they can stay and work in our public healthcare system?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Absolutely. As part of our NDP Cares plan to fix our broken healthcare system, we would hire new recruiters for the medical, nursing, and other schools that would begin relationships with incoming students in year one of their studies. We would also take these recruiters, as well as those scattered within NLHS, and re-organize them into a single Office for Medical Professional Recruitment, so that they avoid duplicating effort and work together towards a common goal while sharing expertise and resources.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. Nurses have heard us make this commitment time and again. It defines our approach, and sets us apart.

First and foremost, we believe that every nursing student should be given an offer of employment at the beginning of their studies, not at the end. We understand some students may not know which area of nursing they may want to pursue – and that’s okay. But we want to give students the certainty of knowing that a job is waiting for them, that they don’t have to look outside the province, and that their service will be fully valued as it ought to be. This will start with the first nursing class in 2026. We will also give every student who is now already training to be a nurse an offer of employment at the same time.

But more than that, we will stop the practice of hiring nurses in temporary, full-time roles only to continue to extend their “temporary” placements. Temporary hiring helps no one. It doesn’t give nurses job certainty which they need to further their lives. It doesn’t give the system the ability to plan long-term for staffing needs.

We do know that there are some cases where part-time or temporary nursing is needed, but we will work to limit this. Additionally, we know that there are some nurses who prefer to work part-time for personal reasons, so we will accommodate nurses according to their own choices.

Fair Collective Bargaining

Context: Nurses are heading into negotiations for a new contract. Fair pay, time off, and respect are key to keeping nurses in the public system instead of losing them to private agencies.

Ask this: “Will you bargain fairly with nurses so they get competitive pay, real time off, and respect at work?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes. As the party of labour, the NL NDP commits to bargaining in good faith with the RNU and all unions representing public sector workers. Indeed we respect all workers’ right to bargain for a fair Collective Agreement. We do not support forcing workers back to work, when they are exercising those rights. We also believe that nurses deserve equal pay for equal work, fair and competitive compensation, guaranteed access to vacation leave, and a respectful and non-violent workplace culture

Our guiding principles in all negotiations would be to:

  • Secure an equitable deal for nurses that makes them feel valued for the hard work they do;
  • Ensure staffing and retention is addressed both in the collective bargaining process, and well as through legislation as outlined throughout our responses;
  • Ensure the highest level of care possible and improved outcomes for patients; and
  • Support, and strengthen a universal, public healthcare system.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. We will always bargain in good faith with the RNUNL.

We respect nurses. We respect the Registered Nurses’ Union. We will ensure all our dealings with you are in good faith. We will listen to your concerns and try our very best to address them. We will start the process of collective bargaining on time, we will commit to timely responses, and we will treat our province’s nurses fairly. We envision a healthcare system where nurses are respected, where students want to become nurses, and where nurses from all over Canada look to Newfoundland and Labrador as a place they want to work. That starts with respecting all nurses and the leaders they elect to represent them, and listening to them.

Instead of telling you what we will do, we believe it is better to talk and collaborate with you on what you need us to do. Priorities and actions ought to be driven collaboratively around the table, and never imposed from the top down. We really need to move past the Liberal era when nurses were told how things would be, were berated for not working hard enough, and were unceremoniously shown the door if they objected. That attitude not only created the current crisis that has cost our province hundreds of nurses and hundreds of millions in travel agency waste, but it also bred tremendous hurt and mistrust. We need to turn the page on that failed approach and instead work together as partners to fulfill the common goal we share – providing the best of care for Newfoundland and Labrador’s patients.

Accountability for Private Agencies

Context: The Auditor General has raised concerns about the high costs of private nursing agencies and possible fraud in past contracts. This demands full investigation and accountability.

Ask this: “Will you investigate possible fraud in private agency contracts, hold those responsible accountable, and make sure public money is spent on strengthening public healthcare?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

New Democrats will not stand idle while our healthcare system is neglected like this. That’s why Jordan Brown initially called for the AG to investigate these contracts all the way back in 2023.

We were shocked and disgusted by the amount of waste, mismanagement, and potentially criminal activity uncovered by the Auditor General when the report came out in June. Leader Jim Dinn called it “appalling – full stop.” He also called for the RNC to investigate the claims of potential fraud. In government, we would ensure that law enforcement conducts its own thorough investigation to see whether charges need to be laid.

Going forward, we would restore trust in the healthcare system with improved training around conflict of interest for NLHS staff, strengthened checks and balances for approval and monitoring of all procurement contracts, and providing more transparency to the public around how the NLHS governs itself.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. We will hold those responsible for inappropriate or potentially fraudulent private agency contracts accountable.

We will make sure a full inquiry is done – any criminal activity will be referred to the police. And if it is the wish of the RNUNL, we will hold an inquiry to get to the bottom of the issue. We must get an understanding of how this was allowed to happen and put safeguards in place to protect against this, or anything like this, happening again.

It is simply wrong that out-of-province travel nurses cost taxpayers four times the salaries of our own nurses. It is simply wrong to expect local nurses to willingly go to work knowing the nurse next to them costs more and has more perks. It is simply wrong to disrespect local nurses while bringing in out-of-province travel nurses by the dozens.

Those responsible for this scandal will be removed from their positions.

To restore public trust and confidence, we will work with the Registered Nurses’ Union, we will publish monthly the number of travel nurses working in the province and the cost. We will set clear benchmarks to reduce reliance on out-of-province travel nurses. And wherever possible, we will always seek to hire local nurses first. We will create a permanent province-wide team of local, Newfoundland and Labrador nurses and Nurse Practitioners. This team will complete locums in different parts of the province, when and where they’re needed most – especially in rural, remote, and underserviced communities. This will reduce the reliance on expensive out-of-province travel nurses.

Vision for Public Healthcare

Context: The public healthcare system is in crisis. Nurses want to know where leaders see it in four years — and how they’ll get there with nurses involved in the decisions.

Ask this: “What’s your plan for fixing public healthcare over the next four years, and how will you include nurses in the solutions?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

With the NDP Cares plan for healthcare, we see a more stable and sustainable healthcare system in the longer term. We pledge to reduce the number of vacancies in our healthcare system by 1,000 in four years. Just some of the proposals we have for achieving our goal are:

  • Setting up an independent Health Sector Safety Council, especially to deal with workplace violence, and occupational safety and health issues, diseases and hazards specific to workers in our health care system.
  • Making shift flexibility a reality by allowing nurses greater power to self-schedule;
  • Committing to a review of the Job Evaluation System applied to allied health professionals in 2015;
  • Reducing the burden on nurses within the system by working with other health care unions to explore ways to reduce workloads, and address vacancies, recruitment and retention issues, and
  • Implementing support and mentorship systems for new health profession graduates.

We also believe that the vacancies in the healthcare system are partly the result of a top-down approach to management within the NLHS. We hear nurses and other health professionals when they say that they feel unnoticed or that the government just doesn’t listen to them. That’s why we pledge to bring nurses and other front-line healthcare professions into decision-making processes that affect them and how they work. We’ll rely on those voices by having management work collaboratively and consult regularly with frontline employees and their unions to improve the work environment, quality of life, and patient care.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

In four years, with a Wakeham PC government, the nursing profession in Newfoundland and Labrador will be transformed into one of strength, stability, and respect. Nurses and Nurse Practitioners will be central to rebuilding a public healthcare system that puts patients first — especially in rural, remote, and underserved communities.

To achieve this, a Wakeham government will add more seats to the nursing school – at least 50 seats in the first year – and expand the Nurse Practitioner program. We will provide paid work terms and job offers at the start of training for nursing students. This will help us train, recruit,

and retain more local nurses, ending the expensive and unsustainable reliance on out-of-province travel nurse agencies.

In rural Newfoundland and Labrador especially, we will establish a permanent team of local nurses and Nurse Practitioners who can travel where needed most — improving access, stabilizing care, and ensuring emergency rooms stay open and fully staffed.

In four years, with a Wakeham PC government, the nursing profession in Newfoundland and Nurses will be supported to practice to their full scope, reducing wait times and increasing patient care. We’ll listen to frontline healthcare workers and include nurses in shaping a Health Human Resource Plan that clearly identifies where staff are needed, and how to get them there.

Most importantly, nurses will no longer be left behind. To improve working conditions, we will always listen and consult with front line healthcare workers and their unions. Nurses have firsthand knowledge of what our healthcare system needs and we will listen.

The people of Newfoundland and Labrador deserve more than a name on a waiting list. In four years, under a Progressive Conservative government, they’ll have real access to care — and nurses and Nurse Practitioners will be leading the way.

Tackling the Biggest Challenge

Context: Everyone knows public healthcare is struggling, but leaders often dodge the question: what do they see as the most urgent problem, and how will they fix it?

Ask this: “What do you see as the biggest problem in public healthcare, and what’s your plan to fix it first?”

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes. The NL NDP has committed to paying nursing students – along with students in social work, pharmacy, and paramedicine – for their clinical placements. We would mandate the NLHS to implement this policy and provide them with the necessary funding to do so within the first year of an NDP government. Funding would come from the money saved from the phase-out of the use of agency nurses.

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. We will pay nursing students for their clinical placements. Not only is it wrong that nursing students don’t get paid for their service, but it’s further shameful that they have to pay to participate in these clinical placements. Nursing students will be paid for their clinicals – because it’s the right thing to do. Our timeline is to correct this injustice immediately, because it is discriminatory, financially burdensome for nursing students, and frankly indefensible to allow such inequities to persist. This should have been remedied years ago. The measure will be financed through general revenues as part of the normal budgetary process, because doing the right thing should be part of the normal course of action.

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Our party has repeatedly said that the failure to address the social determinants of health is the most urgent challenge facing our healthcare system. While the Health Accord acknowledges this and the current government frequently uses the term, we believe that there has not been enough concrete action to improve the foundations on which our health is based. New Democrats agree with all the research that states that people who have the basics in life, like adequate shelter and nutritious food, have lower stress and better health outcomes. This results in fewer chronic and acute illnesses, and fewer visits to clinics and hospitals, thereby easing the workload of health professionals. That’s why we would address the social determinants of health through a number of initiatives, such as:

  • Scaling up the construction of non-market, affordable housing;
  • Increasing the minimum wage to $22 per hour by 2029;
  • Removing the provincial portion of HST from all sources of home heating;
  • Removing the provincial portion of HST from children’s clothing and car seats; and
  • Fighting homelessness by making sure that the most vulnerable get the wraparound services they need, like counselling, job training, or other supports.

We can’t afford not to invest in all of these issues if we are serious about addressing the crisis in our public health care system. To do anything less, eventually costs taxpayers more, and has huge too many negative consequences for the health and well-being of our population, and the health care workers who struggle to provide patient care because of a broken system – a system that we know is not beyond repair.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Nurses in Newfoundland and Labrador are facing a deepening crisis marked by severe staffing shortages, unsafe workloads, rising burnout, and increasing incidents of workplace violence. Despite long-standing warnings, systemic issues remain unresolved, placing significant pressure on healthcare workers and compromising patient care.

Frontline nurses report being stretched beyond safe limits, with insufficient staffing and support to deliver care effectively. We must fix this. We want to work with the Registered Nurses’ Union to stop this crisis and put support in place to help nurses, and that means staffing up. We must hire more nurses, train more nurses, recruit more nurses, and retain more nurses. It all starts with respecting nurses. All of which have been addressed in previous questions.

We will take the Union’s suggestion of creating an independent Health Sector Safety Council to lead coordinated efforts in preventing violence and improving safety across the system. But this will just be one step in better supporting nurses. We want to have more nurses in our public health care system, reducing the burden. We envision a healthcare system where nurses are respected, where students want to become nurses, and where nurses from all over Canada look to Newfoundland and Labrador as a place they want to work. That starts with respecting nurses and listening to them.

Reducing Reliance on Agency Nurses

Context: Private agency nurses cost far more than public system nurses and drain resources from public healthcare. Instead of paying private agencies, we need public solutions that build stability — like the travel nurse program in Labrador, which was created by RNU and has already shown success.

Ask this: “Will you commit to reducing the use of expensive private agency nurses and invest instead in public solutions, like a permanent travel nurse program, to strengthen our public healthcare system?”

Response from Liberal Leader John Hogan

The Liberal Party did not provide a direct answer to this question by the requested deadline. However, they did send a letter to the Union outlining the work their government has undertaken to date. Readers can review the full letter at the top of this page.

Response from New Democratic Leader Jim Dinn

Yes. We plan to phase out the use of agency nurses as a primary staffing strategy within the first two years of forming government. To help us achieve this goal, we would rely more on our underutilized casual nurses. We would immediately step up recruitment within the nursing schools and provide current students with bursaries – along with pay for their clinical placements – so more of them can afford to accept internships in rural, hard-to-fill rural and remote positions.

We also believe that more nurses would return to the public system from the agencies if working conditions improved. That’s why we would also create support and mentorship systems for new nursing graduates, step up recruitment in allied health professions to ease the workload of nurses, and create new systems of governance within NLHS that would make management work collaboratively and consult regularly with frontline employees to improve work environment, quality of life, and patient care.

Response from Progressive Conservative Leader Tony Wakeham

Yes. We commit to phasing out the use of agency nurses as a primary staffing strategy. We will always prioritize the hiring of local nurses – nurses who can afford to build meaningful long-term careers in our communities, and dedicate their lives to providing continuing and compassionate care. It is simply wrong that out-of-province travel nurses cost taxpayers four times the salaries of our own nurses. It is simply wrong to expect local nurses to willingly go to work knowing the nurse next to them costs more and has more perks. It is simply wrong to disrespect local nurses while bringing in out-of-province travel nurses by the dozens.

To reduce reliance on out-of-province travel nurses we will work with the Registered Nurses’ Union, we will publish monthly the number of travel nurses working in the province and the cost. We will set clear benchmarks to reduce reliance on out-of-province travel nurses. And wherever possible, we will always seek to hire local nurses first. We will build the capacity needed to reduce this reliance. To achieve this, a Wakeham government will add more seats to nursing school – at least 50 seats in the first year – and provide paid work terms and job offers at the start of training for nursing students. This will help us train, recruit, and retain more local nurses, ending the expensive and unsustainable reliance on out-of-province travel nurse agencies.

In rural Newfoundland and Labrador especially, we will establish a permanent team of local nurses and Nurse Practitioners who can travel where needed most — instead of relying on out-of-province travel nurses we will have our own team of nurses who can complete locums when and where needed.

Paid Clinical Placements for Nursing Students

Context: Nursing students work directly with patients during training but don’t get paid – while hospitals rely on their care. Other fields pay students for placements; nursing should too.

Ask this: “Will you make sure nursing students are paid for their clinical placements?”

Stay informed and see how your vote can make a difference.